⚾ Canon Ef 24 70 F2 8 Vs F4

Gen 2 much better. The RF 24-105 has IS, is light and portable, your mirrorless has much better low light noise control. I have pics in LR from the EF 24-70 Gen 1, the Gen 2, the RF 24-70 F2.8, and the RF 24-105 F4.0 (plus a lot of other lenses.) The RF 24-105 lives on the camera almost as much as the RF 100-500. Something like the EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM, or EF 500mm f/4 L IS II USM, or maybe the EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS II combined with a Canon EF 1.4x III or EF 2x III Extender. If you use an extender, you will need a wide aperture lens so your camera will still Auto Focus with the extra stop (1.4x) or two stops (2x) of aperture the extender will cost you. The rf 24-70 f2.8 for me would be ~2400€ (minus ~800 for selling your 24-105) (gonna list kind of fair second hand prices to still get the glas in good condition) canon ef 70-200l f4~ 400€ (tamron g2 70-200 f2.8 ~800€) canon ef 16-35l is f4 ~ 650€. A new canon adapter is ~320€ (couldnt find a used one). Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 Di III VC VXD G2; Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM. $1,899.00 at Amazon At f/4 it shows 3,105 lines, with similar performance through much of the frame, but edges that Very undecided between those 2 RF 24-105 F4 or RF 24-70 F2.8 I know the 24-70 has a excellent image quality and its better in low light, but for someone who uses the lens as walk around / travel and mostly landscape photography is a good to get the 24-70? not sure if will make a big difference in landscape photography. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L USM. Canon EF 70-300 F4-5.6 IS II USM. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. The f/4 might well be "worth it" for you. I have owned both lenses but I ended up keeping just the f/4. At 200mm outdoor in daylight the quality is almost identical. At 70-100mm the f/2.8 is better if you compare side by side. In the 70 and 100 range there are other lenses with f/1.2, f/1.8 and f/2. The 24-70 is much better in my opinion because the focus is much faster and locks on. with consistant confidence, the 28-70 was very sharp from f4 , 3.5 was acceptable and 2.8. only if there was no option. The 24-70 is very sharp period. I am confident you would appreciate the difference with your level of skills. Costing $999, the Tokina 24-70mm f/2.8 isn’t cheap, but if it offers comparable image quality, it could represent great value compared to such own-brand options as the $1749 Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM or the $1797 Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED. We ran the Canon EF version of the Tokina 24-70mm f/2.8 though our industry-standard tests to see how The 24-105 f4 RF maybe a mini van lens. From what I see the RF version is better than the EF version. The 24-70 f2.8 is over 2x the cost of the 24-105 f4. I would expect anything that costs over 2.x the cost to be better. I would expect a $45K mini van to be much nicer than a $25K mini van. Depends on your budget and income and needs/wants. Re: Canon 24-70 f/2.8 vs Tamron/Sigma. Someone was nice enough to post a lot of controlled test shots of these which I replied to. The Sigma shaded it for me only at 50mm by a small amount but the Canon is generally a bit sharper than the rest at other focal lengths wide open. The Sigma needs to be stopped down to look good on the edges at 24mm I've owned both at the same time previously. Image quality is hard to distinguish unless you pixel peep. The RF 24-105 is significantly better than the EF version, which made choosing the 24-70 easier betweenthe EF versions. But as others have mentioned, which one you choose depends on your needs. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/4 S. Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. Lens hood is reversible. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM. Canon RF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM. The lens hood can screw onto the lens in reverse so that you can keep it on your camera at all times, ready to use. filter size. 80mm. 83.5mm. This measurement is important to take into account when buying filters. Has a metal mount. Canon EF 24-70mm F/2.8L II USM. Canon EF-S 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS STM. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. 805g. 480g. We consider a lower weight better because lighter devices are more comfortable to carry. .

canon ef 24 70 f2 8 vs f4